Astounding. Universal Medical Care (UMC) is not necessarily a right
or left wing social program. The creation of Ontario UMC or OHIP was
enthusiastically created by Conservatives. You know why? It made Ontario
economically competitive. Here is a basic economic reality. A healthy
population is a happy population. A happy population is a productive
population. Duh.
... Thousands of people(of every political
background) back then were losing their homes or facing a lifetime of
crushing debt, if they or a family member encountered a health crisis by
accidental injury or unexpected chronic illness. However, it was not
designed to cover normal childbirth nor abortion. It was not meant to
cover plastic surgery. It was not meant to cover the pseudo-therapies
like those foisted on gullible people by chiropractor quacks.
...
Further to this point, a the year of 2008 of all the G-8 industrial
nations, the ONLY one that did not have UMC or an affordable health
insurance plan was the United States. The nation with the highest health
(costs both in direct or GDP calculation) was the United States. UMC or
an affordable national health plans work as a social program both for
public and private commercial interests. The ONLY political group
globally who fanatically opposes UMC are the Yankee Republicans. You
wanna know why? They aren't Conservatives, they are morons.
...
Here's a current surprise whether you fixate on being considered right
or left wing. One of the two remaining social issues funded through
government in Canada is a Guaranteed Annual Income, [GAI]. GAI program
is a social program designed provide a better more consistent social
support than the present day balkan Welfare, Workfare or Disability
Support programs. The biggest Canadian advocate for a GAI is not Liberal
nor NDP. In fact those two alleged liberal parties, aren't very good at
structuring social programs in a way to maximize social support
delivery and minimizing the fiscal impact on taxation. The biggest voice
is former Conservative Senator Hugh Segal.
... Trust me. Segal is in
every sense a Conservative. But he is a Conservative who understands
that not all social programs or public ownership commitments are bad.
Global economic success depends on effective social programs designed to
support weaknesses in the socio-economic matrix. In other words, an
effectively run social support system is not the province of right or
left wing ideologies. It is however the possession of those politicians
able to envision the benefits of a social program to benefit the
national interest.
... Idolizing the US Republicans as representative
of a sound Conservative thought, is plain stupid. They are not true
Conservatives but human troglodytes harping back to the times of the
laissez faire, the economic environment of Imperial France of the Sun
King; and then apply Darwinian Theory (a botanical matrix) to economics.
There are many claiming to be Conservatives without ever making an
effort to exactly understand what a true Conservative political ideology
is. They are not Conservatives they are ignorant. The politicians of
the United States Republican Party lack any intellectual dynamic with
regard to comprehending the nature of the global economic matrix.
...
So when it comes to Trump's support of UMC isn't surprising. UMC
properly structured is taxation well spent. UMC is always good for
business. John Robarts and William Davis both Conservative Premiers of
Ontario introduced OHIP not because of political ideology but because it
was in the best economic interest of Ontario.
... Trump
unfortunately lacks political skill. And there are, in various emerging
political dilemmas, that political parties whether claiming right or
left wing allegiances that adopt a political promise that makes sound
business sense. Paul Martin made for the best Minister of Finance in
Canadian history. Compare that with the loathsome sluggish thought
processes of Joe Oliver. One a liberal, balanced the budget and created a
business environment benefiting the national interest. The latter
supported economic theory that tied the Canadian economy to the health
of one single resource (big oil) to the exclusion of eastern based
industrial and manufacturing and its resulting collapse catapults Canada
into another unbalanced budget and imminent catastrophic economic
recession. Oliver used to be a banker. He should know better. Harper
chose him to replace a more effective Flaherty.
... Trump clumsily
insulted Mexicans. Yet he identified (rather badly) a huge immigration
problem in the USA. Mexico is doing what Cuba did. And in Canada's case
doing what Alberta has done to BC and Ontario for about six decades. The
Mexicans are doing exactly what my hometown did when they created a
municipal environment so toxic to their own poor citizens that they
moved to Thunder Bay, which did exactly the same thing in turn by moving
those problems onto Toronto. A lot of governments national, provincial
and municipal move problems like paying forward to larger economies.
They use government policy to move their social problems to other
jurisdictions.
... Trump just tapped into that political reality.
Got condemned by the Thought Police of every political stripe. There are
serious problems in the United States. Trump is a Conservative, just
not imprisoned by it. He articulates a problem like a businessman. He
fails in defining it politically. Trump would make a better President
than the other politicians of the Republican party. UMC is not just the
property of left wing ideologues. Immigration problems belong to all.
Civic irresponsibility emerges from political hacks claiming both
political ideas. At the moment, that is why Trump is leading in the
polls.