Very sad the agonizing end to the Montrealais. The vessel is headed for the iron carrion laden shores of Turkey to be scrapped and obliterated into history. No one is stepping up to buy the ship. Money always remains the problem. Saving a vessel, is a credible idea.
... There is one very famous vessel that would attract enough funding
to keep it afloat. I'm afraid its one or two years away from scrapping.
At the very least, it must be on that cruel short list.
... There
must be a committee formed on both sides of the border to make sure that
the Arthur M. Anderson is preserved. Why? Well, for many reasons.
... It was the sailing companion of the Fitz. It was the very last
contact. For that reason alone, if no other reason existed, it would be a
very excellent traveling memorial to the Fitz and all the lost souls on
the Great Lakes.
... Its a classical design of the "Canaller". Or
specifically, the maritime fashion where ships were built specifically
for the Great Lakes.
... If its owner encounters economic
difficulties or if the closure of steel mills continues, then for costs
savings the Anderson will become expendable. Considering its age, its
not likely to attract any commercial buyers.
... We here all
recognize the problems of maintaining a museum vessel. And ideally that
museum vessel must remain in seaworthy condition. And it must be able to
attract the millions required annually to keep it afloat and in Bristol
fashion.
... It must be a name ship that everyone around the lakes,
and as far away as Vancouver or San Diego recognizes and be willing to
part with their hard earned cash to support it. One of the great reasons
for failure to buy a museum ships on the Great Lakes is the costs and
the prime reason that well meaning groups have difficulty getting
sponsorships is that too often the ship they are trying to save has only
a local significance. So the financial base is very small and weak.
Again, that one ship needs to have a broad financial sponsorship
potential.
... We can't save the Montrealais specifically. There is
no way feasible because away from the Seaway few would have any
attachment even in the slightest. So let's try and at least save one
ship. A ship that the good citizens in Quebec City, in Duluth, in
Thunder Bay(s), in Marquette, in Chicago, in Detroit, in every city on
the Seaway, would be willing to donate enough tens and twenties to make
the effort successful.
... In the name recognition, it must be able
to be strong enough to get funding from the states, provinces and
federal governments. It has to have the fame muscle to convince the
Seaway Corp to waive transfer and canal fees. It must have the name
recognition to receive in kind support of paint from either Dupont or
BASF on an annual basis to keep the paint fresh on the vessel. It has to
have the name recognition that the conservation group can put it to
drydock at a minimal cost. All that is a lot to consider in creating a
Seaway floating memorial museum.
... The ideal fame vessel rests on
the bottom of Lake Superior. The next best candidate is its traveling
companion. And it must be a ship that the entire seaway knows about, and
that candidate can only be the Arthur M Anderson.
No comments:
Post a Comment