The discussion is totally going in the wrong direction. Porter is
absolutely lying about the length of the runway extension. It will be at
least double the numbers given to the council.
The numbers
cannot be real. The numbers listed for the CS100 are numbers not based
on any Transport Canada certifications. They are estimates on
computations provided by Bombardier.
If
you look at the proposed numbers listed in Wikipedia the plane can make
it to almost any point in Canada. I used to work for this guy when his
family owned Austin. This is a MAX, MAX, MAX kind a guy. Max fuel, Max
take off weight, Max Passengers.
Transport Canada will only
approve a take off roll listed plus one thousand. And its crazy not to
have a runway longer than the takeoff roll. Under the present proposal
(not the final one), the runway length is 5000ft.In Wikipedia,
Bombardier evidently created some numbers specific to YTZ.
It
looks good and the plane could, based on numbers not certified by
Transport Canada on an airport extension design itself not certified by
Transport Canada. Under these specs based on a 5000ft runway, there is
no way that this plane can make Vancouver. Considering that the
jetstream usually moves west to east, there are days when the plane will
be lucky to make Calgary. All Bombardier did was provide specs with a
lower takeoff weight, and that means only filling the wings with half
the maximum fuel to satisfy the gullible councillors, stupid investors,
and pollyanna customers.
What Porter wants is to get the proposal
for Jets rammed though approved. Porter already knows that for them to
make the West Coast nonstop they will have to have at least a 6000ft
runway. Anyone even the most amateur of pilots know this but none will
speak up because they are either in awe or totally frightened of the
Porter Owner.
If Porter came with a complete vetted and certified
plan then okay. But that is impossible since the CS100 hasn't gone
through final certification from Transport Canada. Porter will start
building the extension then I guarantee that magically Transport Canada
will come to Council that the runway must be 6000ft.
So okay.
Anyone can see this train coming out of the tunnel. But approving the
runway extension means that the Hanlon Point Ferry docs will be rendered
unusable. Even now the ferries come within 150ft of the restricted zone
for water craft off the end of runway 24. Extend that runway means that
the Hanlon ferry the Onaigara that carries bicycles and vehicles in
summer must make one perhaps three course and speed adjustments.
If
another 500ft is added to the length of 24 that extra 200M is
significant. You see its a major change. The present small craft
exclusion zone may likely be extended itself. YTZ is a grandfathered
airport. Its approaches and departure angles are using old criteria.
Adding to the runway length means that Transport Canada will change
everything to bring the approaches up to modern standards. So the
approaching jets will fly lower on approach and take off, making more
noise for a longer period than what Porter is telling council.
The
final 6000ft 24 runway will be made wider because most days its a
crosswind runway. And jets come in a lot faster than the Bombardier
turboprops. New certifications will be introduced.
What it means
is that the Hanlon's point ferry docks will most likely become unusable
from a cost standpoint. Ferries are square boxes and the more maneuvers
means the travel time will be longer. A six thousand foot runway may
even impact the Centre Island ferry routes. The Onagaira time and travel
costs will certainly balloon forcing Toronto ferries to use only two
ferry docks and put demands on the Centre dock in the summer.
The
only people who will benefit from all this, are the rich investors with
shares in Porter. And if you don't believe me, jets or not jets isn't
the issue. Airport extensions aren't the issue. The issue is that the
use of the Toronto Islands themselves by all of Toronto residents, not
just the jet setters, will be severely impacted far beyond what Porter
is telling everyone. The issue should be the impact on a valuable
recreational resource for all the citizens.
Appendix Oct/2014
1.
According to another airport watchdog, the landings and approaches for
the existing runway will mean that in all likelihood that tall ships,
such as the Empire Sandy will no longer be permitted in the inner
Toronto Harbor. Sailing ships have masts. They stick way up. Into the
standard glide slope of jets. Indeed the Royal Canadian Yacht club and
other marinas may have to close its doors to sailing vessels. That
presents a quandary. Yes the rich boys can get to Calgary five minutes
faster, but your sailing yachts, they're out of here. Definitely the
Western Gap of the Harbour will be rendered unusable for most sailing
ships yachts.
2. Since the writing of this note,
Metrolinx is constructing a dedicated rapid rail link between Downtown
and Pearson. This makes any costly expansion to jets on CYTZ a very
questionable effort.
3. Regardless of what people
think. The impact of a runway improvement on the Toronto Harbour is far
greater than Porter is willing to admit. I am not against Billy Bishop
being used or continue to being used for high performance turbo props.
People fail to understand this is not an issue against progress. It must
be discussed before the election. After is too late.
This
harbour is everyone's playground. None of the present numbers presented
by Porter/Bombardier really jive. Deluce is on record of assuring his
own clients that he wants Porter flights to Vancouver nonstop. At 5000',
the distance Deluce proposes, with the numbers presented to Council
from Bombardier with performance stats of a plane that at that point,
hasn't completed full flight testing. Under those stats. The plane
cannot reach Vancouver without a safety refuel in YYC (Calgary). The
numbers are there. Deluce proposes five thou, needs six, and Transport
Canada for that type of craft will want 6'000. They will force, arm
twist Toronto City council for that little bit more. Is why Deluce
wanted the city to start the runway fill to go in now. Once that fill
goes in. Its too late.
Toronto City Council should make
no decision on this until a Transport Canada signed and approved design
for a CYTZ expansion. Toronto City Council should also base their
decision on performance statistics after Transport Canada approves those
performance numbers based on aircraft certification after a full cycle
of flight testing. If that aircraft can make YVR on 3/4 fuel with a
1/2hour fuel supply with the load taking off from a 5000 runway. Then
its okay to consider that.
What is most disturbing is
that no mayoral candidate or council candidate seems to have tackled
with the issue before the Municipal Elections. After the Municipal
elections, its too late. Candidates should declare themselves now.
No comments:
Post a Comment