Friday, March 30, 2007
Great expectations and the real city
http://www.torontoist.com/
Interesting. It espouses a city that in truth, doesn't exist. A lot of the artsy fartsy types that control city hall promote the city as being that way. Oh yes, these events and people do exist. The reason for this dominance is that the city elders feel the need to compete with other cities. Then for the reason for economic development, attracting conventions and tourism all this... all this... call it what it is... out trots this bullshit.
At the leading edge of this tourist effort cycles the artistic effort of youth before alcoholism and the ravages of crack take their toll on the straw castles of mythic dreams. The fastest way to get funding for their artistic urges is to create things like this link. It appeals to the wealthy elite of the city, the business leaders that holds a firm grip on the life of this city.
Literally it is young artists and the useless progeny of the upper middle class trying to make a lazy partying life out of trying to appear to be culturally advanced. In other words its a gang of young culturally challenged goofballs trying to appeal to the elite business class. They do such things to kiss the bigger ass.
The result carries all the way into the annoyingly elitist CBC and rests displayed for all to see. These leaders of culture show nothing but arrogant, self interested, small minds unable to see their city outside of the rose colored glasses they wear.
In turn, in righteous justification for their well clothed greed, they work assiduously to misrepresent the true Toronto. The polished society, the modern city they portray, the mythical city doesn't exist. And at the end of the day, its good for their property values.
This facet is lost in ridiculous sites like the Torontoist. That city is an invention. That city is like the singles ads which portray a single person looking for a mate as liking arts, music, dining, Blue Jays, and long walks in the park.
Have you ever been to a Toronto park? Its like any city park. I never see these people there. Mostly its joggers, drunks, crackheads, nannies, suicidal bipolars looking for a tree to hang themselves, and city works personnel goofing off. Cute sexy singles are to city parks as elephants are to Yellowknife.
Worse, they pass this off to the hinterland as the real way to live. Well this would be good. Except it doesn't exist.
To a person from places like my former hometown like Marathon, which is a small community purpose built to serve the labor needs of a large corporation and possesses a simple mono-culture, a place like Toronto confuses. They bring their values, their social experience to the bigger pond and as such their expectations don't work for them.
One does not need an advanced education to live in Marathon. It doesn't challenge the temporal lobe of a Nematode. One does not need intelligence or wisdom to climb the social ladder. This isn't wrong. Such a life is quite comfortable. Its another world socially. But its failure comes that the dynamic dreams of youth must be suppressed for creature comfort. It leads to mental depression. However when a person arrives in a place like Torontoist portrays they rapidly become disillusioned since the social dynamics are so different and the promise of the elite doesn't match the real culture.
They are no longer socially important. It is why small towners complain about customer service. In a small town customer service comes from a neighbor. In a city the customer service comes from a stranger. The latter expects a tip.
And it is no coincidence whatsoever that the leading brainiacs of a place like Marathon brag about not paying out tips. It never failed. Two lines down the conversation these forested intellects will always parlay this rant adding that they don't like Toronto because they get poor customer service... Well duh!
Now father always did well in city travel more than my mother. He travelled the world often and functioned adequately for a small town type of person. He had the intellectual edge to explore and cared less about social status, race or cultural bridges. He could live anywhere. The only disconcerting thing that as an advanced intellectual he possessed the charming quirk of tending to mutter unaware anyone else was listening.
A couple of times I caught him muttering about what size of tip acceptable in this city. There was a rate for every city in Canada. He would slide over to every inlaw chum and always, always ask about the tip rate in every town. He would chart every facet of life but failed to record each rate in every city. In Calgary and Port Arthur, it was 10% of the bill. But in Winnipeg, on the train and in Fort William, it was 15%. He liked Port Arthur and Calgary quite a lot.
Yet he was absent minded to the extent that I overheard him mired in the usual end of meal internal debate. He sometimes lost track of his rate schedule mentally. And this usually exploded into muttering about which the percentage in this city was. I heard it several times. So did the waiters standing right next to me. Not a cool thing.
I digressed. But it shows the angst which even seasoned travelers from small towns confront the social dynamics of the larger city. They expect the city portrayed in the Torontoist web site. Alas. It aint.
The real Toronto is a gritty mud bath of ordinary people from a confluence of global cultures all mushed into a single community. They are friendly enough. They are more open to new people than the small town person. As they grow older they are not as status conscious as found in small towns. Toronto is a collage of cultures and its a dirty hot tub. It is not CBC.
A small town person is no longer a person of some status in this social structure. Most Toronto people are occupied with working hard, paying off the rent or mortgage, raising a family, getting fucked, eating, finding cheap food, partying, and getting loaded. Social status except for the few, doesn't exist. Its a muddy swamp. Thats the real Toronto.
Most city people I know have never been to a play, haven't even been up the CN Tower, or the Zoo, or the Harborfront, or Pantages. Professional sports events are too much money. Cable provides entertainment. I don't know anyone who listens to CBC. I don't know too many people who attend the theatre on a regular basis. And most of the arts and music culture are buskers looking for a buck on the streets.
The problem with why people hate Toronto is that they get off the plane expecting a city like the brochures. They will find the advertised in the narrow tourist traps that do exist. City tours go up Yonge street or Spadina to Yorkville. Tours don't go up Sherbourne to Regent Park. They tour down King West to Bathurst then turn right north up to Queen street. They don't go beyond to Parkdale or Dundas West.
Tours. To get to the small elite Beaches district, one must travel through East Toronto where the real city dwellers live. As a result even the street cars go fast through that zone in a headlong need to get to the magical land. It is when the visitor steps outside the glitz of the tourist trap that they run into the real city. Whoops! The myth falls.
And its expectations. It can be a confusing crush, the real city. The small town person is a stranded guppy in a clash of people, and transactions. Its a jungle path dark and full of hidden traps to the perceptions of a visitor outside the glitz tourist channels. Its like Disney World set in the Everglades. Inside the wonderful experience. Outside that compound, alligators.
To live in Toronto, the real Toronto one must like the swamps and alligators of human existence Not appreciating this fine point about urban existence leads to the misconception about a place like Toronto.
To a person from a small town driving in a busy town like Toronto can be a nightmare. It is not that traffic is all that bad in Toronto. Its perception. Small town drivers think that they are great drivers. No on the contrary. Its that to live in Toronto one must be a very good driver. Traffic in Toronto is actually a very efficient system. One needs to understand that to thrive to drive one must practice good driving.
The final point strikes the heart of the small town person. Officially they proclaim that they hate Toronto when really they do not want to admit to the world that they lack the driving skills or talent to function. e.g. Most Marathonians hate the 401. Oppositely, I have always loved driving the 4o1. I like driving down Bay Street from Dupont to Harborfront. I like driving through Portage and Main or Cumberland Street or Fort William Road. Its the challenge. Its attitude.
There lies the problem. People from the small towns in Northern Ontario bash Toronto or city life. Its their privilege and it makes them happy. But it isn't the fault of Toronto. It is the fault that everyone seems to buy into the mythic vision that Toronto wishes to portray. Its a show, not the real Toronto.
And it confuses the people outside Toronto because the real Toronto is far more dynamic and contrarily ordinary than advertised. There is a wall created by the city elite, and the tourist misconception between how absolutely functional Toronto is compared with smaller communities. Such a site as Torontoist displays the dream of a city not the actual gritty core of a city.
Political pontiffs like the present day Mayor were elected by the voting majority of suburbanites of the metropolitan zone. There lies the problem. The suburbanites are professional, or financial, or well paid government workers or educators who know little about inner city life. They go to work the same way every day, and go home to a quiet refuge or nest. They toil for years, grow a family, sell the house and quietly die banished to an old folks home. They are not the real city. They buy into the vision of the city portrayed by pseudo-intellectual and completely compromised politicians like David Miller.
They participate little in the city life. The suburban home is but a quiet refuge where it is convenient to hide until death. But every three or four years they control the voting power to elect politicians that paint the pretty version of their community not the real city. They sit communicating away on the internet inventing the city that really doesn't exist and never did. Their city is pretty, cleansed of all foul smelling things.
Yet like the sewers these people exploit the inner city. It is why the rest of the city foisted on the residents of St. Clair a transit way of ancient, antiquated street car technology because it was their vision not the real vision of the real St. Clair resident. The people that are now doing this to what was once a wonderful culturally dynamic neighborhood will destroy it much like they molded the Spadina district. Its not the concept of the real people living there. These arbitrary people imposing a vision on a vital district eventually destroy that neighborhood. They visit the place once to open the beast they conceived then go elsewhere to plague city life.
Such behaviors destroy the city neighborhood. Despite the pontifications from the bombastic mayor, while transitways look good on paper, in every instance they are factual disasters. The operations of the Spadina right of way are spastic, inefficient, impaired the functioning of the street, and is an alien space vehicle in a cringing world. Patently it is a success to the people who forced the project on the community in retribution for stopping a commuter motor expressway. In reality though having experienced the before and after of such a project clearly the
Spadina transitway is an abject failure.
The only saving grace for that area is the Kensington market where the real city retreated to and thrives is that it escaped the attention of the other neighborhoods. Unfortunately for the residents on St. Clair they will experience the same idiotic project that plagued Spadina. It takes a year to build the transitway and it takes about 15 years to recover socially from such a false project. It gives the neighborhood about ten years grace before the next social brainstorm from the suburbanite social elite to return its attention.
Why explore this pathway into this essay. What it shows is that there is a great gap between the perception and the reality. When I moved to Toronto I didn't move to the alleged upscale parts of town. They are the minority dysfunctional parts of Toronto. If I lived there in those illusions for any length of time, certainly I would be back in Edmonton.
The first time I moved here twenty years ago I went straight into the neighborhoods one is not supposed to like. I found it to be gritty, affordable, real and fun. I didn't go with the program. Also I found that the people who came to this city into a district like this one tended to stay in Toronto. The suburbanite refugees tended to always want to be somewhere else. They wanted a small urban town in a big city.
Now this confuses the people in places like Marathon. A large part of this is that they buy the outward face portrayed by the minority elites of Toronto. When confronted by the real city, like the city suburbanites they tend to go back home. Now this is not wrong nor right. It is the way it is.
One cannot come to a densely populated place like Toronto and expect things to accommodate their needs at the snap of a finger and no tip. One instantly loses all the social status, personal recognition, and close familiarity of a small town. One must drive to the efficiencies of city traffic not fumble around like it was a country lane.
So when a person clicks on a site like "The Torontoist." Take it with a grain of salt and a lot of doubting gravy. Its the promotion of a myth. A city that really doesn't exist. Its interesting for a few. Really though. Its complete bull crap.
(Note this is a draft only, I may return to revise the essay.)
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Seal of approval
Or is this just me?
Black's case
*The following article is provided for the education and edification of Canadian students on a noncommercial site of no particular benefit to anyone else.
*************
This article originally published by the Times of London (this day), which was a oh either a competitor or owned by Conrad of Doublecross Harbour. Anyway to know him... and all that.
Black portrays himself as a victim
The Hollinger boss claims that he was taken in by a ‘web of deceit’, reports Tom Bower from the trial in Chicago
WITH obvious distaste throughout the first week of his trial, Lord and Lady Black have silently entered the 12th-floor Chicago courtroom appearing like outsiders at their own party. Walking past dozens of journalists whom Barbara Amiel characterised in a courthouse lift as “vermin” and facing a jury described as “working class, meat-and-potato folk” — a class the two social aristocrats have always disdained — the Blacks seem bereft of much comfort.
The odds, they know, are stacked against his acquittal. No less than 95% of federal prosecutions for fraud in the city end in conviction, and he faces 17 charges, including racketeering and obstruction of justice with a maximum sentence of 101 years in prison.
After their marriage in 1992, the Blacks had gleefully posed as an A-list power couple, travelling on their corporate Gulf-stream jet between their four sumptuous homes and mixing with billionaires, power brokers and politicians. Neither imagined the current scenario of humiliation and financial ruin. Nor did they calculate that their lifestyle, financed by Hollinger International’s public shareholders, would become the subject of a criminal trial where her confession — “now I have an extravagance that knows no bounds” — would be mercilessly regurgitated.
Conrad Black is accused of stealing more than $60m (£31m) from Hollinger by helping himself to money assigned as noncompete payments in the contracts to sell most of Hollinger’s newspaper empire after 1998. He is also accused of spending $40,000 of Hollinger’s funds on Amiel’s 60th birthday party in New York for 80 friends, of spending $250,000 by using Hollinger’s jet to fly on holiday to Tahiti with Amiel, and of swindling the company of about $3m in a swap of apartments in Manhattan. In the prosecution’s words, Hollinger was transformed by Black into his personal “piggy-bank” or the “Bank of Conrad Black”.
In his opening statement, Ed Genson, one of Black’s lawyers, dismissed the “perks” as consistent with a tycoon’s life. “His private life is his business life,” said Genson. Portraying Black as “a family man and a master of language who did everything by the book”, Genson admitted that Black’s self-incriminatory e-mails where he speaks disdainfully about shareholders and is unapologetic about using Hollinger’s money for his personal lifestyle show him as “snotty” and arrogant but, he insisted, not a thief.
“Other than a bad attitude you’re not going to find a single thing that’s wrong,” said Genson. “He was not stealing for himself. The company was stolen from him.” Establishing Black as a victim of theft is a fascinating undertaking.
The “thief”, according to Black, is David Radler, Black’s partner since 1969. Together they built the world’s third-larg-est newspaper company. According to Genson, the two partners split their newspaper empire, isolating themselves from each other.
While Radler ran the business in Israel, America and western Canada, Black was responsible for eastern Canada and Britain. Allegedly, neither spoke to the other about their own activities. “And just as the companies were run,” said Genson, “they were also sold.” In other words, Black was allegedly ignorant about all the sales and the phoney noncompete payments that Radler negotiated as the newspapers were disposed of.
In return for a 29 months’ imprisonment and a $250,000 fine, Radler has admitted one crime and agreed to testify against Black and his three codefendants. Radler has also paid about $100m in fines and compensation to Hollinger.
Just how Black will successfully pose as the ignorant victim of his partner intrigues the prosecution. After all, he was chairman, chief executive, a major shareholder and exercised the majority of voting rights. Repeatedly, in e-mails and conversations, he called Hollinger “my company” and described himself as the “proprietor”. Although more than $100m poured into his personal bank account from illegal deals, Black claims that he never closely questioned Radler about the source of the money.
Black, Genson told the jury, was Radler’s victim. “Radler spun a web of deceit,” said Genson and, to save himself from 30 years’ imprisonment, “cut a deal to end all deals . . . by dishing Conrad”. However, in his autobiography Black repeated 33 times how Radler was a close friend and partner with whom he shared every thought.
The first witness to undermine the defence was Gordon Paris, a banker recruited by Black in May 2003 as a director of Hollinger to reassure irate shareholders about Black’s honesty.
Paris testified: “Conrad Black was quite knowledgeable about Hollinger’s finances . . . Black had effective control of Hollinger.”
In June 2003, Paris ordered a special committee of directors to investigate Black’s conduct. In November 2003 they reported that Black had masterminded “corporate kleptocracy”, pocketing with Radler and others about $400m, or 73% of the company’s net income over six years.
Black and his codefendants have so far prevented the jury hearing the report’s damning conclusions. But in the internet age, it is likely that some jurors will, contrary to the judge’s orders, read the report.
In court, Black wanted to accuse Paris of outrageously enriching himself and wrecking the company. His lawyers squeezed into the record that Paris did at one stage earn $15,805 a day and feathered his nest by replacing Black as Hollinger’s chief executive and chairman.
The conclusive evidence of Paris’s greed, suggested Black’s lawyer, was a dinner on November 13, 2003, at Le Cirque — “one of New York’s most expensive restaurants”. Paris shot back: “That was only for Hollinger directors. We were talking business.” The topic was Black’s dismissal for dishonesty. Black has waited ever since that dinner to exact revenge.
The characterisation of that dinner as a “perk” provoked the prosecution.
“When you were at Le Cirque at Hollinger’s expense,” Eric Sussman, the prosecutor, asked Paris, “were you celebrating a birthday? Was there an opera singer? And was there a pianist?”
Sitting close to her husband, dressed in a black suit and a Chanel scarf, Amiel lent forward, noticeably tense. Conrad Black’s face flushed.
“No,” replied Paris. To intensify the Blacks’ embarrassment, Sussman continued: “And did you charge to Hollinger any clothes and tips for doormen?”
Amiel sank back in her chair. Notoriously, despite receiving an income of $1.45m from Hollinger, Amiel had charged the company $20 for a tip to the doorman of Bergdorf Goodman, the fashion store on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue.
“No sir,” replied Paris. All those perks will emerge during the trial, which promises to be ferocious and dirty.
Before leaving Toronto, Black promised to destroy his accusers. The lust for blood is shared by his young prosecutors. Their careers depend on convictions.
Over the next four months, neither side will show mercy or magnanimity. Conrad Black has declared that this is a fight to the death, and nobody disagrees.
Tom Bower is the author of Conrad and Lady Black, published by Harper Press
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Copyright furball & disclaimer
Here goes. And this is sworn on the Bible. Well a Quran. I got that for free last week. It will do.
"All written material posted on this website aka Blog is for the edification and education of students in Canada. This is a noncommercial publication. "
"No moneys paid. No monies received. If they want 15% of doo dick all, they got it. Would you like that in cheque form or direct deposit from me behind?"
"If any clown decides to bitch about this read the Canadian Copyright legislation for a change. And if said comedian decides to go anal about this throw me in jail where I will get three squares a day at $100,000 per taxpayer year: and like I will get a degree in Extraterrestial Aquaculture again at taxpayer expense just like learn to speak French too just like Karla; go ahead, go for it. How do I get four years out of this? Oh, I will get off the copyright charge, but get four and half solars for telling the judge just what I am going to say to you. Got a problem with our fine education system? If you do. Fuck right off."
Man, can I write a disclaimer or what.
Monday, March 19, 2007
Black is the colour of a heart
CHICAGO — Barbara Amiel Black lashed out at the media Monday, reportedly calling reporters “vermin,” as the fraud trial of her husband Conrad Black was adjourned for the day after questions over tainting of the jury surfaced even before lawyers had a chance to present opening arguments.
The constant media spotlight on Black and his family — and the clambering of reporters and photographers trying to get to him — sparked an incident between Amiel Black and journalists in an elevator when the Blacks left for a late morning break in the trial.
The former newspaper columnist was waiting to go down in the elevator with Black and his daughter when a television producer approached them and asked if they were leaving the building.
Black, who recognized her from earlier coverage of the trial, asked if she was going to ride down with him and “breathlessly” relay word of his approach to the cameramen waiting outside the building.
British journalist Joanna Walters said that as the doors closed, Amiel Black called the TV producer “You slut!”
According to Walters, who is covering the trial for the London Daily Express, Amiel Black then turned to her and another female journalist in the elevator and told them: “You’re all vermin. I’m sick of this. I used to be a journalist and I never door-stepped people.”
There was no immediate comment from Amiel Black denying or confirming Walters’ account. Amiel Black has not commented to the media about the case since jury selection in the trial began last Wednesday.
The elevator incident came shortly after Judge Amy St. Eve delayed the trial and Black’s defence lawyers raised concerns that news of a settlement by the media baron’s former partner David Radler — a key prosecution witness — may taint the jury’s views and are interfering with Black’s right to a fair trial.
St. Eve planned to swear in the jury and start with the prosecution’s opening statement but postponed the trial to Tuesday. Unconfirmed reports said a juror did not arrive in court and could not be reached in time.
On Friday, Radler — Black’s former top executive in the Hollinger group — signed a US$28.7-million settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a deal that will also see him barred from being an executive or director of a U.S. public company.
Then Sunday night, a second US$63.4-million settlement was announced with Sun-Times Media, the new incarnation of Hollinger International, that settled claims against Radler related to backdated stock options when he was chief operating officer at the company.
The timing is “real troubling,” Black’s U.S. lawyer Ed Genson told St. Eve before proceedings began.
Radler has already pleaded guilty to fraud and has agreed to testify against Black in the criminal case in return for a lenient jail sentence of 29 months and a US$250,000 fine.
Genson also objected to a quote by former Hollinger International CEO Gordon Paris — the prosecution’s first witness — “bragging about the money these people collected from Radler.”
Tammy Chase, Sun-Times director of investor relations, would not comment on whether the company had considered the possible repercussions of releasing news of the settlement just hours before the trial was set tto begin.
She said the settlement had been finalized over the weekend.
“Once we had the settlement nailed down we had to disclose it,” she said. “We’re a public company.”
Asked about the defence’s objections to Paris’ comments in the Sunday night release, Chase said he “was quoted because he was the head of the special committee.”
Lead prosecutor Eric Sussman said he had been unaware of the Sunday settlement until Genson mentioned it in court.
James Morton, head of litigation at Steinberg Morton Hope and Israel in Toronto and president of the Ontario Bar Association, said the timing would be “highly problematic” in Canada, and questioned whether the prosecutors were using the media to try their case.
But others said it was “dangerous” to read too much into Monday’s one-day adjournment, which could have resulted from any number of reasons.
“It could be as innocuous as a doctor’s appointment” for one of the jurors, said Orin Snyder, a former federal prosecutor currently with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Crisis Management Practice Group.
Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Michigan, said starting jury selection over would be one possible remedy in the case, especially if enough of the members of the pool read the articles about Radler’s settlement.
But, he added, St. Eve may have just been looking to get all the opening arguments in in one day, and decided to adjourn once it became clear that wasn’t going to be possible.
“She’s going to have to examine (the issue) and see whether it taints the 20 people,” Henning said.
“The last thing a judge wants is to have a conviction reversed.”
While he agreed that the timing of the news, “certainly lends some credence” to the defences claim that Black and his co-defendants may not get a fair trial as a result of the settlement, he said it was unlikely to be enough of a reason to get rid of the current jurors.
“Once the jurors hear the government’s opening argument, they’re going to hear about how bad these people are,” he said.
Earlier Monday, Black had little to say upon entering court to face fraud and racketeering charges.
“My views of these charges and my expectation of the verdict are well known and I haven’t changed them,” said the former media tycoon, who has called the charges a “monstrous defamation” and predicted he will be vindicated.
Officials said the trial was set to resume Tuesday, when St. Eve is expected to swear in the jury and then give the floor to Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Cramer, who will lay out the government’s case.
Prosecutors allege Black defrauded shareholders and used money from the Hollinger International newspaper group to cover extravagant personal expenses. The charges centre on the sale of hundreds of community papers and US$85 million in “non-compete” payments allegedly pocketed by executives of Black’s former newspaper empire
Black is charged with wire and mail fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, racketeering and obstruction of justice.
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Going to buy
Keep on chatter
Oh what, oh what
All knows what comes next
Oh what if I won the lottery
Some buy cars
Some buy vans
Some buy houses
Most buy drugs
Some buy hookers by the cans
After an hour skill dreams fits
I only have one fantasy skid
Instead, I'll get a big street car
Painting up like a part of transit
Sign reading "Not in Service"
Then run along the Dundas streets
Sucking up free power
From the citywide grid.
By G. Duncan Campbell
© All rights reserved 2005
Friday, March 02, 2007
Dilemma
Freezing rain keeps pouring down in this endless storm. Which is okay, this is good for the grass. The lawn grass to be more specific. Would hate to spread false imagery.
Anyway, now there is a strong desire to go outside. Yes I know its confusing to me too.
_
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Onwards and downwards
I applied everywhere. Shut out. Its the old story. Its not who you know, its who you Lewinsky. I've given up trying to find anything in that line of werk.
_
Monday, February 26, 2007
Hair Craft

Oh the cheers.
This morning I took a look at my long hair in the mirror. Its hard finding a part in long hair. Yecch.
I can't afford a haircut. The right one is twenty bucks. The wrong one is free. I used to look good.
Now its getting attached. Hey women just love this stuff. When I kept my hair short I couldn't get close without the look of initial fear. Now. "Oh, Its just an old hippie... cool."
Amazingly I'm in my mid 50's. All my other friends my age have money and can afford a haircut. But are mostly bald. Its indeed a twisted world.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Exasperations
Phoned home. The skills of age cause depression. Of this I am convinced. I speak as a person whose wandered in and out of light depression ever since early teen age. About this, I am an expert.
I can honestly say I haven't had a truely good day abandoned from the grey clouds of depression. No matter how bright and sunny a day there was always a small black thundery rain cloud sitting over Signal Hill going "Okay Dunc, make my day!"
A phrase "the Age of Spin" was said to cover the last twenty years. Hell it began a lot longer than that. The selling of the dream began in the 1950's. A great dream of personal wealth and intellectual peak was sold to a couple of generations.
By the time you reached. Exasperation means that these individuals and good friends of mine appear to be impacting the wall of mental depression. Each individual had excellent high paying jobs. The careers though weren't part of the great dream.
The people that cope appear to have suffered from depression for years. The new person seems shocked by the impact of this disease. We veterans do sympathize. How do the vets cope?
Well like any one go get help. Second, and this is important, realize that you are not alone nor
Getting help. Thats the problem. Many of the counselors seem not to have ever suffered from severe or mild depression. They smile cheerily and say "So! You are depressed!"
Grrrrrrrrr
Then these "expert" counselors do the referral game. Hello has any one suffering from depression ever gone through the referral game and lived to tell the tale? It used to be counselors would be possessive. Nowadays the counselors get paid extra to refer.
Plus they don't have to expose themselves to reverse assessment. I practice reverse assessment. They assess me, it is only fair to assess back. Experts don't like this. It is far more difficult to continue with a program of treatment than to refer. Its sluffing off.
They have the Ryerson Hungarian degrees pasted on the wall saying they know everything. But I never seen them in the Salvation Army or soup kitchens where sufferers of mental health congregate and live out their lives in the bleakness of impoverished disillusion. Its the place to learn what mental illness truly is.
There are counselors who do work in that environment. Many only have good hearts but the government only pays for "good" school degrees. They play the referral game. Ever wonder why so many mentally ill live homeless or in shelters? Its because like the society at large they like to sluff off ill patients.
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
The game rules. Basic chicken and egg stuff. Well to get help you must be referred to a doctor. You cannot get into the system without a family doctor. On the other hand you cannot get help without getting a referral to a doctor from a mental health worker.
Doctors make so much money that depression caused by poverty or money problems staggers them to disbelief. Solution, hand out drugs.
Worse, all doctors seem to think they know how to treat depression. I guess the ten years in medical school seems to have given them the right to understand everything or think they know everything. I caught one poor bipolar soul undergoing a crisis because the doctor prescribed Zoloft. On every leaflet about Zoloft it clearly states that one must not give it to a sufferer of bi-polar depression. She couldn't quit this doctor because her treatment hinged upon having a family doctor. I've yet to meet a General Practitioner who knew anything about mental illness of any sort. Its an ego thing.
How do the veterans of depression cope? One of the most important things is to realize that you are not alone. You are not the only sufferer of depression. This takes practice. Initially all depression like an illicit drug consumes the user. It makes the sufferer believe that they are the only ones to suffer from this, that there is no treatment, that no one understands.
It is important to realize that this is completely false. Yes, it literally puts the person into a state of constant pain. You must completely overcome this emotion often by sheer will power. If you do not want the grey life caused by drugs, the sufferer can use the option of self realization that this is the way it is and this is the way it always be.
Embrace it. To defeat something like this it must be stared in the face.
Why are all these guys suffering from depression. Well they all are males. Oh a couple of females. The males are in their fifties.
They have work and are either retired or nearing retirement. A large part of the depression stems from that "Dream." Causes.
1. Drugs or booze. Even quitting them doesn't guarantee the elimination of mental depression. Narcotics Anonymous (NA) recognize that often drug dependency stems from depression and people self medicate. They succeed because they make an effort to deal with dependency, the depression and socialized alienation of depressive behaviour.
If you are depressed avoid drinking or drugs... or if not don't get too high or buzzed. The high you feel is false.
2. Age. Perpetual youth was part of the old dream. The dream was to reach retirement age, cash in, ditch the old spouse, lie on a caribbean beach, drink a lot of beer and boink a lot of babes or hunks. Well aint that the life. Well by the time most are fifty the babes have wrinkles. And even if you could do anything, do it once then you gotta take three days rest.
Age. Even as late as the 1950's an aged person was revered as a source of wisdom and leadership. Well hasn't that idea gone to the dark side. Age the curse. Age the new leprosy.
The only thing is to mutter. "Okay you young little jerk, someday sooner than later you're going to be a broken down, fat, old flatulating, snoring, whiskered useless piece of shit. I can hardly wait to see it... If I don't die first. Hell thats a good reason to try to live."
3. Sports. Upon retirement you can play any sport. Now all your physical impairments disqualify you physically from major things like referring a checkers championship. And Hey doesn't anyone ever play Checkers anymore?
4. Personal goals. Hey I wanted to be a horse jockey. That really depressed me when I was disqualified because at the time there were no horses around Marathon. Now they tell me I'm too old. I am a victim of discrimination. Things like that cause depression.
Well thats just a few things. I just want those guys to know that I am thinking of them. Hoping for the best. Hope to see you sometime.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Shorter story
Normally mid-asian foods curry no flavour with me. However... What? That hurt you a lot more than it hurt me. My story. My bad jokes.
On with the tea. Its really good. I don't dare take it a couple of days before a doctor's appointment. The blood pressure soars. Well I drifted in wearing a shirt, no coat, no jacket. Its only minus three or four and the rest of the city dwellers are wrapped like real weinies. I live just across the street. Its not like going to the south pole. No big deal.
Anyway the tea is wonderful. Grade AAA. Spicy. Medium for only a buck.
So this Chinese guy pipes up while I exit the establishment. How tall are you?
"5'2" I said.
"No" he replied laughing.
"Ya true." says I. "I was born before 1970. The government brought in metric. Now I'm shorter."
Monday, February 19, 2007
Technical Imperium
More imperial technology. My ad hoc wireless connection to the internet will be tested tomorrow morning. Its going to get warmer apparently. I believe its also temperature dependent. I love the cold. Too bad.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Oven pans

Time is aborting. I improved the signal reception of this internet station by the use of a strategically bent oven pan. It cost two bucks but it works a little.
I also found the correct distance about 10.5 inches to the reflector surface. My apologies to the metric people. My ruler was in inches. I do measure my dick metrically. I comes to a better number. Numbers impress.
But I can dispose of the old antenna. This is a good thing since I was running out of food and the last antenna is about to be used.
It doesn't work... unless
One of the most important lessons of the Viet Nam War was the fact that rotation of active combat troops doesn't work. In that war the rotation for troops was one year duty.
Now on the eve of a Taliban spring offensive General Hillier is rotating out veteran troops and is sending in green or raw troops. Even if those troops have been there before, it takes a bit of work to get back into the non routine of being shot at. This is the critical point in the war. The decisive moment. The Taliban will certainly throw everything they got.
The Taliban now know that the Canadians rotation is coming about. Notice they haven't picked a fight with Canadians in the last couple of months. But last spring when the Royal Canadians showed up for the first time they waited till the Pats went back to the Edmonton barracks.
Most of those 44 Canadian casualties were suffered on a fresh rotation. This is a no brainer. The smart move would be to rotate the Princess Pats back into action sooner than later. Then keep them on station as a regiment until next year in the autumn of 2008. But Hillier is Harper's lap dog now.
An all out attack by the Taliban against fresh raw Canadian troops may cause another 200 casualties under the worst scenario. But keeping the present troops on station then supplementing them with Princess Pat vet volunteers would enable the field commanders in Afghanistan to have the best available human resource for countering the new Taliban offensive.
_
Travelling brains
Head honcho soldier Hillier complained about the Liberal record regarding the military. This despite the fact they were the ones who assigned him the top job.
Hillier is the same general who went for a field visit about. This event is documented by embedded reporters. A roadside bomb went off a few yards ahead of his personal column. Instantly he abruptly turned tail and headed directly for Ottawa. And didn't stop until he got behind his nice safe desk.
He's like the dog who bravely barks knowing that his master and the rest of the pack is dealing with the threat. The instant the threat looks at him, he hides in his master's legs.
I will not call him a coward although I may believe him to be.
No general worthy of the rank would ever want to put his troops, in this case Canadian troops into such an untenable situation as they find themselves. He's a soldier who knows nothing about the art of war. Any smart leading commander would have fought tooth and nail to avoid the situation in Afghanistan. He's the Andrew McNaughton of this generation.
This country and the armed services need a new Harry Crerar.
Friday, February 16, 2007
Garbage bags
I once bought a very tough sounding bag that ripped in a wind. There is a lesson in this.
The toughest garbage bag I ever got was non of them names. It had only Professional Garbage Bags 7 mil. I still use them. They don't wear out. They don't rip. I am avoiding buying tough things.
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Lunch time for Marconi
Friday, January 26, 2007
Missi-marathon burning
The ambient temperature is below zero. That is an important number.
Marathon is burning. Its Rec Centre. Last year the pool. Talk about going to hell in a hand basket. I leave for about four years. Looks whats happens.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Dusting alien beings
Any UFO landing in the USA as such will now be illegal.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Testing H20s
Luckily I don't do that. No one wants to start off the day slagging Hell.